The perennial curiosity in psychoanalysis exhibits no symptoms of abating, and the durability of psychoanalytic concept is noticeable within the diversified extensions and gildings of Freudian pondering within the fields of neuroscience and cognitive conception. the iconic curiosity in psychoanalysis is, in lots of respects, comprehensible: psychoanalytic idea addresses such concerns as subconscious psychological approaches, self-deception, and wish-fulfilment, and makes daring claims by way of utilizing those recommendations to provide an explanation for either daily behaviour and scientific phenomena. however, whereas advancements in mainstream psychology have repackaged lots of Freud’s principles (demonstrating the energy of Freud’s thinking), there is still doubt concerning the veracity of psychoanalytic claims, and questions about the position of psychoanalysis vis-à-vis technological know-how. in addition, advancements within the fields of philosophy, psychology, and the cognitive—and neurosciences—since Freud’s time additionally require attention with admire to appreciating their implications for modern psychoanalysis. Such issues can have vital useful implications, seeing that psychoanalysis isn't easily focused on concept for theory’s sake and as a substitute considers the consequences of conception for healing perform. despite the fact that, assessing psychoanalysis in mild of modern day learn isn't a simple undertaking, now not least as the complexity of psychoanalytic conception increases complicated medical and philosophical questions in regards to the nature of brain and the character of the clinical company itself. for this reason, a clean review of psychoanalysis within the new millennium involves a standpoint that's instantly clinical and philosophical and represents the junction the place philosophy, technology and psychoanalysis meet.
Read or Download Philosophy, Science, and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Meeting PDF
Similar psychoanalysis books
This quantity in a booklet sequence on psychoanalytic leaders, presents a geographically international sampler of writing stemming from Winnicott's complicated and paradoxical pondering. within the first part, on his paintings and legacy, his pondering is positioned right into a context to bare anything of the origins, major milestones, modern improvement, and theoretical growth of his pondering.
Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm
Guattari's ultimate booklet is a succinct precis of his socio-philosophical outlook. It contains severe reflections on Lacanian psychoanalysis, structuralism, details idea, postmodernism, and the concept of Heidegger, Bakhtin, Barthes, and others.
In Search of the Spiritual: Gabriel Marcel, Psychoanalysis and the Sacred
Gabriel Marcel (1889-1973), the 1st French existentialist and phenomenologist, was once a world-class Catholic thinker, an entire playwright, drama critic and musician. He wrote brilliantly approximately a number of the vintage existential subject matters linked to Sartre, Heidegger, Jaspers and Buber ahead of the book in their major works.
The vertical labyrinth : individuation in Jungian psychology
E-book via Carotenuto, Aldo
- Storytelling, Narrative, and the Thematic Apperception Test (Assessment of Personality and Psychopathy)
- Art before the Law: Aesthetics and Ethics
- Colonization Of Psychic Space: A Psychoanalytic Social Theory Of Oppression
- Lousy Sex
Extra resources for Philosophy, Science, and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Meeting
Sample text
It is not what we know or presume to know about Shakespeare, but rather how close reading, hearing, and witnessing the plays allows us to find the Hamlets, Lears, Macbeths, and Falstaffs, in ourselves. Harold Bloom, an aesthetic critic, writes: “we hear, speak and know ourselves and others” (Bloom, 1998, pp. 1–17). We value the insights of creative writers on Shakespeare, such as Samuel Johnson, William Hazlitt, T. S. Eliot, James Joyce, and W. H. Auden, among others. One must be cautious of theorists who attempt to simplify what is complex, and to be wary of formulaic conclusions.
40–44) 22 W H AT S H A K E S P E A R E T E AC H E S U S A B O U T P S Y C H OA N A LY S I S She makes explicit and merges action with desire, explaining that they should be one and the same, and attacking his mixed feelings as a weakness. She attacks his manhood: When you durst do it, then you were a man; And to be more than what you were, you would Be so much more the man. Nor time nor place Did then adhere, and yet you would make both. They have made themselves, and that their fitness now Does unmake you.
It is interesting that Hamlet likens himself both to Hercules and to Hercules’ first 36 W H AT S H A K E S P E A R E T E AC H E S U S A B O U T P S Y C H OA N A LY S I S adversary. 286). Hercules is thus no longer a part of his imago. This may represent, through the process of the drama, the development of the conflictual identification with Claudius and King Hamlet. 141). Here Horatio imagines the earth as a female in which men bury “extorted treasure”. Hamlet will not yet take in Claudius as a father, nor will he fully take in the ghost of his father as substitute.