Posted on

Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing: 7th by Armin Biere (auth.), Kerstin Eder, João Lourenço, Onn

By Armin Biere (auth.), Kerstin Eder, João Lourenço, Onn Shehory (eds.)

This e-book constitutes the completely refereed post-conference complaints of the seventh overseas Haifa Verification convention, HVC 2011, held in Haifa, Israel in December 2011.
The 15 revised complete papers provided including three device papers and four posters have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from forty three submissions. The papers are geared up in topical sections on synthesis, formal verification, software program caliber, trying out and assurance, event and instruments, and posters- scholar event.

Show description

Read or Download Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing: 7th International Haifa Verification Conference, HVC 2011, Haifa, Israel, December 6-8, 2011, Revised Selected Papers PDF

Similar international books

Project E-Society: Building Bricks: 6TH IFIP International Conference on e-Commerce, e-Business, and e-Government (13E 2006), October 11–13, 2006, Turku, Finland

Foreign Federation for info ProcessingThe IFIP sequence publishes cutting-edge ends up in the sciences and applied sciences of data and communique. The scope of the sequence comprises: foundations of desktop technology; software program conception and perform; schooling; laptop purposes in know-how; verbal exchange structures; structures modeling and optimization; details platforms; pcs and society; computers know-how; safety and safeguard in details processing structures; man made intelligence; and human-computer interplay.

Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions in Nuclei: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Heidelberg, July 1–5, 1986

Nuclear physics is shortly experiencing a thrust in the direction of primary phy­ sics questions. Low-energy experiments assist in trying out past latest stan­ dard types of particle physics. the quest for finite neutrino lots and neutrino oscillations, for proton decay, infrequent and forbidden muon and pion de­ cays, for an electrical dipole second of the neutron denote a number of the efforts to check contemporary theories of grand unification (GUTs, SUSYs, Superstrings, .

Extra info for Hardware and Software: Verification and Testing: 7th International Haifa Verification Conference, HVC 2011, Haifa, Israel, December 6-8, 2011, Revised Selected Papers

Example text

Given a timed sequence ω of the form v0 δ0 (φ0 ,ψ0 ) −→ σ0 v1 δ1 (φ1 ,ψ1 ) (φn−1 ,ψn−1 ) σ1 σn−1 −→ . . −→ vn , let ζi (x) represents the value of x (x ∈ X) when δn the automaton has stayed at vi for delay δi along with ω (0 ≤ i ≤ n), and λi (x) represents the value of x at the time the automaton reaches vi along with ω. It follows that λ0 (x) = a d if x := d ∈ ψi (0 ≤ i < n). if x = a ∈ γ(v0 ), and λi+1 (x) = ζi (x) otherwise Definition 2. For an LHA H = (X, Σ, V, V 0, E, α, β, γ), a timed sequence of the form v0 δ0 (φ0 ,ψ0 ) −→ σ0 v1 δ1 (φ1 ,ψ1 ) (φn−1 ,ψn−1 ) σ1 σn−1 −→ .

As ζv3 (x) < 5, ζv3 (x) > 3, and ζv3 (x) − 1 = 2δv3 , we can get 1 < δv3 < 2. Because ζv3 (y) − 1 = δv3 , we can get 2 < ζv3 (y) < 3, which contradicts with ζv3 (y) > 4. As these constraints are generated according to the invariants and guards from transition e2 , e3 , and location v3 , v4 , this implies the path segment v2 −→ e2 v3 −→ v4 is infeasible, but v2 −→ v3 is an feasible one. Therefore, if the DFS e3 e2 algorithm is clever enough, it will backtrack to the location v3 and traverse the next branch v3 −→ v1 .

Both symbolic model checking and bounded model checking are facing the complete state space or the partly complete space under the threshold at one time which is always too large and complex for the solver to handle. In order to control the complexity of the verification of LHA, we proposed a linear programming (LP) based approach[8] to develop an efficient path-oriented reachability checker to check one abstract path in the graph structure of a LHA at a time to find whether there exists a behavior of the LHA along this abstract path and satisfy the given reachability specification.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.79 of 5 – based on 6 votes