Posted on

The Declining Significance of Homophobia: How Teenage Boys by Mark McCormack

By Mark McCormack

Study has generally proven excessive faculties to be adversarial environments for LGBT early life. Boys have used homophobia to turn out their masculinity and distance themselves from homosexuality. regardless of those findings over the past 3 many years, The Declining importance of Homophobia tells a unique tale. Drawing on fieldwork and interviews of younger males in 3 British excessive colleges, Dr. Mark McCormack indicates how heterosexual male scholars are along with their homosexual friends and happy with their pro-gay attitudes. He reveals that being homosexual doesn't negatively have an effect on a boy's attractiveness, yet being homophobic does.Yet this available publication is going past documenting this crucial shift in attitudes in the direction of homosexuality: McCormack examines how diminished homophobia ends up in the growth of gendered behaviors on hand to younger males. within the colleges he examines, boys may be able to increase significant and loving friendships throughout many social teams. They exchange durability and aggression with emotional intimacy and monitors of love for his or her male pals. loose from the consistent possibility of social marginalization, boys may be able to discuss as soon as feminized actions with no censure. The Declining value of Homophobia is key examining for all these drawn to masculinities, schooling, and the decline of homophobia.

Show description

Read Online or Download The Declining Significance of Homophobia: How Teenage Boys are Redefining Masculinity and Heterosexuality PDF

Best nonfiction_6 books

Warpaint Series No. 48: Westland Lysander

Heritage of and squadron colours of the Westland Lysander airplane of WWII.

Extra resources for The Declining Significance of Homophobia: How Teenage Boys are Redefining Masculinity and Heterosexuality

Example text

These debates are by no means settled, and I both recognize biological aspects of gender and sexuality (LeVay, 2010; Wilson & Rahman, 2005) and understand these identities to be historically and culturally situated (FaustoSterling, 1992; Weeks, 1985). However, it is also important to recognize that some academically discredited work (such as Freud’s theory on the genesis of homosexuality) still maintains influence on cultural understandings of masculinity today. Thus, in order to understand this legacy and appreciate the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary sociological theories of masculinities, it is necessary to examine the various theories that have maintained cultural and academic credence in the history of gender scholarship.

I therefore argue that until sexuality and gender cease to be discourses that stigmatize desires and identities, subordinated groups must continue to contest and challenge these norms through identity politics. If minorities concede their identity labels, they are at risk of the exclusion that dominant groups historically, repeatedly, and even contemporarily levy against them (Collins, 2000; LeVay, 1996; Rubin, 1984). Indeed, as Lorde (1984) states, “It is axiomatic that if we do not define ourselves for ourselves, we will be defined by others—for their use and 8 SETTING THE SCENE to our detriment” (p.

These debates are by no means settled, and I both recognize biological aspects of gender and sexuality (LeVay, 2010; Wilson & Rahman, 2005) and understand these identities to be historically and culturally situated (FaustoSterling, 1992; Weeks, 1985). However, it is also important to recognize that some academically discredited work (such as Freud’s theory on the genesis of homosexuality) still maintains influence on cultural understandings of masculinity today. Thus, in order to understand this legacy and appreciate the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary sociological theories of masculinities, it is necessary to examine the various theories that have maintained cultural and academic credence in the history of gender scholarship.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.68 of 5 – based on 27 votes