Posted on

Formal Argumentation First International Workshop on Theory by Modgil, Sanjay; Oren, Nir; Toni, Francesca

By Modgil, Sanjay; Oren, Nir; Toni, Francesca

Show description

Read Online or Download Formal Argumentation First International Workshop on Theory and Application, Tafa 2011, Barcelona, Spain, July 16-17, 2011, Revised Selected Papers PDF

Similar international books

Project E-Society: Building Bricks: 6TH IFIP International Conference on e-Commerce, e-Business, and e-Government (13E 2006), October 11–13, 2006, Turku, Finland

Foreign Federation for info ProcessingThe IFIP sequence publishes state of the art ends up in the sciences and applied sciences of knowledge and verbal exchange. The scope of the sequence comprises: foundations of computing device technological know-how; software program conception and perform; schooling; machine functions in expertise; conversation platforms; structures modeling and optimization; details platforms; pcs and society; computers know-how; defense and defense in info processing platforms; man made intelligence; and human-computer interplay.

Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions in Nuclei: Proceedings of the International Symposium, Heidelberg, July 1–5, 1986

Nuclear physics is shortly experiencing a thrust in the direction of basic phy­ sics questions. Low-energy experiments assist in trying out past state-of-the-art stan­ dard versions of particle physics. the hunt for finite neutrino plenty and neutrino oscillations, for proton decay, infrequent and forbidden muon and pion de­ cays, for an electrical dipole second of the neutron denote a few of the efforts to check state-of-the-art theories of grand unification (GUTs, SUSYs, Superstrings, .

Additional info for Formal Argumentation First International Workshop on Theory and Application, Tafa 2011, Barcelona, Spain, July 16-17, 2011, Revised Selected Papers

Sample text

4. 5. R. Baumann, G. Brewka, and R. Wong legally IN iff x is labeled IN and ∀b : (b, a) ∈ R, b is labeled OUT, legally OUT iff x is labeled OUT and ∃b : (b, a) ∈ R and b is labeled IN, illegally IN iff it is not legally IN, illegally OUT iff it is not legally OUT, super-illegally IN iff it is illegally IN and ∃b : (b, a) ∈ R and b is legally IN or UNDEC. The algorithm for computing all preferred labellings (Algorithm 1) starts by assigning to all arguments the label IN (labelling LIN ), and initializing an empty set in which candidate labellings are to be stored.

Among the 100 AFs, we observed an average improvement by 50-51% and by 54% for preferred and stable semantics respectively. The data contained some inconclusive examples which had “marred” the results to some extent. 2. No instance, neither for preferred semantics nor for stable, was found in which the execution with splitting lasted longer than the one without. This shows that the additional overhead introduced by splitting is negligible. 3. The optimized type of splitting did better than the non-optimized type in cases when the AF without splitting had a relatively long runtime.

Intell. 77(2), 321–358 (1995) 4. : Splitting a logic program. In: ICLP, pp. 23–37 (1994) 5. : Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. R. ) Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) 6. : An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argument and Computation 1, 93–124 (2010) 7. : Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 1(2), 146–160 (1972) 8. : Splitting a default theory. In: Proc. AAAI 1996, pp.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.49 of 5 – based on 40 votes