By HP Lee
This publication explores how the separation of powers doctrine in Malaysia has been adversely stricken by a couple of significant constitutional conflicts one of the a number of very important organs of presidency. It concludes with the author's concepts at the trajectory of constitutional improvement in Malaysia.
Read Online or Download Constitutional conflicts in contemporary Malaysia PDF
Similar constitutional law books
This ebook examines the "constitutional faith" that has, considering the fact that 1788, been a principal section of American "civil faith. " via taking heavily the parallel among wholehearted popularity of the structure and non secular religion, Sanford Levinson opens up a bunch of interesting questions on what it capacity to be American.
With a purpose to be potent, overseas tribunals will be perceived as valid adjudicators. eu Consensus and the Legitimacy of the eu courtroom of Human Rights presents in-depth analyses on no matter if ecu consensus is in a position to improving the legitimacy of the ecu courtroom of Human Rights (ECtHR).
Curiosity in constitutionalism and within the courting between constitutions, nationwide id, and ethnic, non secular, and cultural variety has soared because the cave in of socialist regimes in japanese Europe and the previous Soviet Union. when you consider that global struggle II there has additionally been a proliferation of recent constitutions that vary in numerous crucial respects from the yankee structure.
Dedication to unfastened speech is a basic principle of all liberal democracies. even if, democracies can fluctuate considerably whilst addressing the constitutionality of legislation regulating definite different types of speech. within the usa, for example, the dedication to unfastened speech below the 1st modification has been held by means of the perfect courtroom to guard the general public expression of the main noxious racist ideology and accordingly to render unconstitutional even slender regulations on hate speech.
- The Power of Precedent
- Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment
- Housing Desegregation and Federal Policy (Urban and Regional Policy and Development Studies)
- The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany
Extra resources for Constitutional conflicts in contemporary Malaysia
6 Great Britain, Malayan Union and Singapore: Statement of Policy on Future Constitution (Cmd 6724, 1946) 3. The British Government expressed that for the time being, the distinct social and economic interests of Singapore warranted a separate government. Also see B Simandjuntak, Malayan Federalism 1945–63: A Study of Federal Problems in a Plural Society (OUP 1969) 40. 7 ibid (n 6) 41. 7 Constitutional History and Political Developments 7 to the Malayan Union was the feeling of insecurity that had arisen from the proposed creation of a common citizenship.
5 North Borneo and Sarawak existed as protected states in Borneo, whilst Brunei remained a sultanate receiving British protection. Japanese forces invaded Malaya on 8 December 1941 and shortly thereafter, the British army surrendered in Singapore on 15 February 1942. From 1942 to 1945, the Malay Peninsula and Singapore came under Japanese occupation. The end of the Second World War saw the return of British rule and the disbanding of the Straits Settlements. Penang and Malacca were grouped together with the Malay States in 1946, under a new political body called the Malayan Union.
Political disputes at the state level engendered conflicts between the Federal government and some State governments. In 1977, the Federal government, under Tun Hussein Onn, invoked emergency powers under Article 150 of the Constitution to deal with a political crisis in Kelantan. The Emergency Powers (Kelantan) Act 1977 was enacted to extend Federal executive authority to Kelantan ‘in respect of matters which are now within the executive authority of the State of Kelantan’. ‘Legislative authority of the State of Kelantan in respect of all matters which are now within the legislative authority of the State of Kelantan’ was conferred upon the Ruler of the State of Kelantan, to the exclusion of the Legislative Assembly of that state.